All our theories of science are formulated on the assumption that space–time is smooth and nearly flat, so they would all break down at
the big bang singularity, where the curvature of space–time is infinite.
This means that even if there were events before the big bang, one could not use them to determine what would happen afterward, because predictability would break down at the big bang.
Correspondingly, if we know only what has happened since the big
bang, we could not determine what happened beforehand.
As far as we are concerned, events before the big bang can have no consequences, so they
should not form part of a scientific model of the universe.
We should therefore cut them out of the model and say that time had a beginning at the big bang.
Many people do not like the idea that time has a beginning, probably because it smacks of divine intervention.
(The Catholic church, on the other hand, had
seized on the big bang model and in 1951 officially pronounced it to be in accordance with the Bible.)
There were a number of attempts to avoid the conclusion that there had been a big bang. The proposal that gained widest support
was called the steady state theory.
It was suggested in 1948 by two refugees from
Nazi–occupied Austria, Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold, together with the Briton Fred Hoyle, who had worked with them on the development of radar during the war.
The idea was that as the galaxies moved away from each other, new galaxies were continually forming in the gaps in between, from new matter that was being continually created.
The universe would therefore look
roughly the same at all times as well as at all points of space.
The steady state theory required a modification of general relativity to allow
for the continual creation of matter, but the rate that was involved was so low-about one particle per cubic kilometer per year—that it was not in conflict with experiment.
The theory was a good scientific theory, in the sense that it was simple and it made definite predictions that could be tested by observation.
One of these predictions was that the number of galaxies or similar objects in any given volume of space should be the same wherever and whenever we look in the universe.
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, a survey of sources of radio waves from outer space was carried out at Cambridge by a group of astronomers led by Martin Ryle.
The Cambridge group showed that most of these radio sources must lie outside our galaxy, and also that there were many more weak sources than strong ones.
They interpreted the weak sources as being the more distant ones, and the stronger ones as being near.
Then there appeared to be fewer sources
per unit volume of space for the nearby sources than for the distant ones.
This could have meant that we were at the center of a great region in the universe in which the sources were fewer than elsewhere.
Alternatively, it could have meant that the sources were more numerous in the past, at the time that the radio waves left on their journey to us, than they are now.
Either explanation contradicted the predictions of the steady state theory. Moreover, the discovery of the microwave radiation by Penzias and Wilson in 1965 also indicated that the universe must have been much denser in the past.
The steady state theory therefore had regretfully to be abandoned.
the big bang singularity, where the curvature of space–time is infinite.
This means that even if there were events before the big bang, one could not use them to determine what would happen afterward, because predictability would break down at the big bang.
Correspondingly, if we know only what has happened since the big
bang, we could not determine what happened beforehand.
As far as we are concerned, events before the big bang can have no consequences, so they
should not form part of a scientific model of the universe.
We should therefore cut them out of the model and say that time had a beginning at the big bang.
Many people do not like the idea that time has a beginning, probably because it smacks of divine intervention.
(The Catholic church, on the other hand, had
seized on the big bang model and in 1951 officially pronounced it to be in accordance with the Bible.)
There were a number of attempts to avoid the conclusion that there had been a big bang. The proposal that gained widest support
was called the steady state theory.
It was suggested in 1948 by two refugees from
Nazi–occupied Austria, Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold, together with the Briton Fred Hoyle, who had worked with them on the development of radar during the war.
The idea was that as the galaxies moved away from each other, new galaxies were continually forming in the gaps in between, from new matter that was being continually created.
The universe would therefore look
roughly the same at all times as well as at all points of space.
The steady state theory required a modification of general relativity to allow
for the continual creation of matter, but the rate that was involved was so low-about one particle per cubic kilometer per year—that it was not in conflict with experiment.
The theory was a good scientific theory, in the sense that it was simple and it made definite predictions that could be tested by observation.
One of these predictions was that the number of galaxies or similar objects in any given volume of space should be the same wherever and whenever we look in the universe.
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, a survey of sources of radio waves from outer space was carried out at Cambridge by a group of astronomers led by Martin Ryle.
The Cambridge group showed that most of these radio sources must lie outside our galaxy, and also that there were many more weak sources than strong ones.
They interpreted the weak sources as being the more distant ones, and the stronger ones as being near.
Then there appeared to be fewer sources
per unit volume of space for the nearby sources than for the distant ones.
This could have meant that we were at the center of a great region in the universe in which the sources were fewer than elsewhere.
Alternatively, it could have meant that the sources were more numerous in the past, at the time that the radio waves left on their journey to us, than they are now.
Either explanation contradicted the predictions of the steady state theory. Moreover, the discovery of the microwave radiation by Penzias and Wilson in 1965 also indicated that the universe must have been much denser in the past.
The steady state theory therefore had regretfully to be abandoned.
No comments:
Post a Comment